At 14:50 Uhr -0800 19.01.2002, Daniel Parks wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > > >OK, so it's proof of concept. That clears things up for me. > >On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 02:22 AM, Max Horn wrote: > >>At 1:30 Uhr -0800 19.01.2002, Daniel Parks wrote: >[ . . . ] >>>On Friday, January 18, 2002, at 07:06 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: >[ . . . ] >>>> <maintainer><![CDATA[John Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]]></maintainer> >>> >>>Ugh. Time to learn XML "for real." >> >>Huh, what? I don't like doing it like that, but I's perfectly >>legal. The < and > appearing in the data have to be marked as >>CDATA. otherwise the file would be invalid XML. An alternative >>would be to translate them to > and < but I think that would >>be a really bad idea. So I think your remark is not very fitting. >>In any case, for my opinion on this, see above/my other mail. > >I meant that I didn't understand the syntax; that /I/ should learn >XML "for real."
Ah OK, sorry for the misunderstanding. >The "ugh" was because I thought it looked ugly... Agreed :) Cheers, Max -- ----------------------------------------------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
