The way I was thinking everything should work is to have to extensions, .info and .xinfo. Then Fink could look for both, and if it is .info, use the old format, and if it is .xinfo, use the new (probably XML) info format. If anybody was interested in YAML info files, then we could also use .yinfo, though that would force everybody to know both formats.
Just my two cents, Kyle Moffett On Sunday, January 20, 2002, at 06:07 , Max Horn wrote: > At 9:43 Uhr +1100 21.01.2002, Matt Stephenson wrote: >> If we moved to a new package format I vote for XML, but I would also >> like to see fink continue to support the current format. > > In any case we would go on the old format, at least for several months, > and possibly for ever. _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
