as far as I'm concerned if you can compile it, and run it why worry about
the warnings. I think it would be better to try and keep as close as the
author intended it to be.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Would it be better to use the two-level namespace support of ld instead
>of fighting against it? I'm not trying to be confrontational, I just
>would like to know the best way of handling linker issues. It seems to
>me that the use of -flat_namespace just raises the need for a bunch of
>other flags like -undefined suppress and -multiply_defined suppress.
>I'm concerned about all the `suppress' options hiding problems that
>really ought to be fixed properly.
�.��^`�.,][JFH][`�.,��.��][JFH][�.��^`�.,
Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst
Phone: (780)-408-3094
Fax: (780)-454-3200
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.��^`�.,][JFH][`�.,��.��][JFH][�.��^`�.,
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
