At 16:39 Uhr -0700 25.09.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
>On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 04:29  PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
>
>>Pejvan BEIGUI wrote:
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>Hi there,
>>>I just made a fresh install of 10.2 and reinstalled from scratch fink,
>>>following the guide on the web site. Everything runned perfectly, I'm so
>>>happy with that. Big big cheers to the team :-)
>>>while reinstalling lftp, I noticed that this package required the
>>>installation of openssl, while it's already installed in Jaguar.
>>>Maybe it's just a stupid question, or an RTFM one...
>>
>>No, this came up recently, but it's not yet fixed. The fink package 
>>should be 0.9.6g, but during its build phase it links with the 
>>0.9.6e libraries in /usr/lib, so it is in reality a mixture of the 
>>2 versions, and it announces itself as 0.9.6e.

Interesting, why did nobody tell me and file a bug report I wonder?



>It sounds like from discussions on IRC that we are considering 
>getting rid of the Fink openssl package. I think this is probably a 
>good idea.

Why exactly? Not that I am directly opposed, but stating reasons is 
always a good idea if you are "for something", no? :-)



Max
-- 
-----------------------------------------------
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
phone: (+49) 6151-494890


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel

Reply via email to