At 16:39 Uhr -0700 25.09.2002, Ben Hines wrote: >On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 04:29 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: > >>Pejvan BEIGUI wrote: >>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>Hash: SHA1 >>>Hi there, >>>I just made a fresh install of 10.2 and reinstalled from scratch fink, >>>following the guide on the web site. Everything runned perfectly, I'm so >>>happy with that. Big big cheers to the team :-) >>>while reinstalling lftp, I noticed that this package required the >>>installation of openssl, while it's already installed in Jaguar. >>>Maybe it's just a stupid question, or an RTFM one... >> >>No, this came up recently, but it's not yet fixed. The fink package >>should be 0.9.6g, but during its build phase it links with the >>0.9.6e libraries in /usr/lib, so it is in reality a mixture of the >>2 versions, and it announces itself as 0.9.6e.
Interesting, why did nobody tell me and file a bug report I wonder? >It sounds like from discussions on IRC that we are considering >getting rid of the Fink openssl package. I think this is probably a >good idea. Why exactly? Not that I am directly opposed, but stating reasons is always a good idea if you are "for something", no? :-) Max -- ----------------------------------------------- Max Horn Software Developer email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: (+49) 6151-494890 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel