Hi Jean-Francois On Dienstag, Oktober 22, 2002, at 05:51 Uhr, jfm wrote:
Good to see it appearing in 10.2 !
It's a first start, and will get better... (E.g. svn-server etc.)
Mhmmm... I am not sure about that. I was thinking of doing a svn-client-ssl variant. Do you think that is not needed? I was thinking that something which depends on a package in crypto needs to be in crypto to. But I might be wrong here. What do you think? Anyone else?But please, give an alternative neon23 | neon23-ssl in the Depends and the BuildDepends...
And is an "=" for the version really required _ wouldn't ">=" be good enough ?Unfortunately 'neon23 (= 0.23.4-10)' is needed right now, since subversion depends on a specific version of neon. It will complain otherwise and not build. This should be fixed for a future version of svn.
Best, Chris.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4699841;7576301;v?http://www.sun.com/javavote
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
