At 16:26 Uhr -0800 04.11.2002, Ben Hines wrote:
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 02:22 PM, Max Horn wrote:
At 23:56 Uhr +0900 04.11.2002, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Monday, November 4, 2002, at 01:11 PM, Ben Hines wrote:
Bingo. definitely a gcc bug, already filed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl and search for 7327.
My apologies for posting this and promptly going to bed. Thanks
Jean-Francois, Max and Ben for looking into it.
It kind of leads to the question of what to do about fink's
default CPPFLAGS again.
Well, I think we should still stick to the new scheme. It will
prevent far more problems than it will cause in my estimation, and
working around a real compile bug (which still is possible!) is
IMHO superior to having to work around the normal, correct, yet not
desired behaviour caused by our old usage of CPPFLAGS etc.
compile bug?
I actually meant "compiler bug", that was just a typo.
Max
--
-----------------------------------------------
Max Horn
Software Developer
email: <mailto:max@;quendi.de>
phone: (+49) 6151-494890
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
