On Saturday, November 22, 2003, at 09:27 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: [...]
It would, of course, have the adverse effect of making backtraces virtually
unreadable.
One of the additions to rpm-build in recent times is the creation of a splitoff-like package with debug symbols (libraries with empty code and data sections, just debug info). That way, if you have a core file from a stripped package, you can install all the necessary *-debug packages, convince gdb to read the symbols from them (I'm a little fuzzy on how this works), and get the old-style symbolic backtrace.
I'm pretty sure the creation of the -debug packages relies on a feature of binutils which does not exist in Darwin, but I haven't looked very closely. Has anyone else ever looked at this?
-- Charles Lepple [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
