On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:29:40PM -0500, Dave Vasilevsky wrote: > >>The packages for lame and atk1 do not follow shlibs policy. They have > >>both userland run-time programs and compile-time headers and .dylib > >>links in %N which is BDOnly. > > I have a fixed version of lame that I have been using privately for the > past while. I sent it to Sylvain, either he's too busy or my email > didn't get through. Should I simply commit this to CVS?
Did you take the approach I was going to do, or something else? Either way, if you want additional eyes looking it over before committing, post it here (if it's short:) or email me. Or commit it and we'll all just see it in fink-commits... dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
