On Mar 1, 2004, at 3:38 AM, Daniel Macks wrote:
SplitOff: <<
 Package: %N-shlibs
 Replaces: %N
<<
SplitOff2: <<
 Package: %N-dev
 Replaces: %N (<= 3.93.1-10)
<<

Should SplitOff:Replaces:%N also have versioning? Otherwise it doesn't
make much sense.

That's true. It seems lame-shlibs has had that for almost two years. Nice catch!

I modified that to point to the right version (not that it matters, since it's in the 10.1 tree, but can't hurt).

The current lame version in /stable is identical to this new .info except for the BDO fix and a dependency fix, so I'll be committing this to both 10.3/stable and 10.3/unstable unless there are any objections. If someone with access to a 10.2 system would fix things up for 10.2-gcc3.3, that would be great.

Dave


Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to