> >In the case you're packaging libfoo, and you split it in 3 (libfoo-dev,
> >libfoo-shlibs, libfoo-doc), you end up with an empty libfoo package.
> >
> >What's the good policy for this? Is there a way to tell fink libfoo
> >package don't exists (only the splitoff are instalable) or is it better
> >not to split libfoo-dev and keep its data into libfoo?
>
> One possibility would be to just call the main package libfoo-dev and
> not have an extra -dev splittoff.
Didn't even thought about that :)
That would work, but as RangerRick said, it would be more consistent not
to make a libfoo-dev splitoff.
Thanx.
--
Bertrand
Pike Language - http://pike.ida.liu.se/
Caudium WebServer - http://caudium.net/
CAMAS WebMail - http://caudium.net/camas/
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
