Hey list,
In the case you're packaging libfoo, and you split it in 3 (libfoo-dev, libfoo-shlibs, libfoo-doc), you end up with an empty libfoo package.
What's the good policy for this? Is there a way to tell fink libfoo package don't exists (only the splitoff are instalable) or is it better not to split libfoo-dev and keep its data into libfoo?
Generally in this case, if it's primarily a library, you don't need the "-dev" splitoff, put that stuff in "libfoo" instead.
-- Benjamin Reed, a.k.a. RangerRick [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://ranger.befunk.com/ Now Playing: "Torn to Tattered" by Carbon Leaf
------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
