I would recommend the following headings for end-users: System Binary distribution: Fink version; package version (Now: Point Distribution: bindist; Package) Source distribution: Stable version; Unstable version (Now: Current: Stable package; unstable package)
I don't think the terms "point" and "bindist" are very well known. Furthermore, the term "package" is a bit redundant. After all, the table lists a version number, not a package name. Also, it may be a good idea to make the distinction between heading (e.g. "Binary Distribution") and subheading (e.g. "fink version") more clear. Either visually (add a horizontal line between them) or layout (use different font size or font weight). I accidentially read the headings as "Point bindist" and "Distribution package". Regards, Freek ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
