On 10/31/05, RM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi - I just read the restrictions regarding GPL ruled packages dependent on > OpenSSL. Am I correct to assume that all packages with ssl support should > therefore be defined as 'Restrictive'. It seems quite clear from the doc but > I ask as there are quite a few packages currently not observing this > relatively new policy. >
They should be Restrictive _unless_ they link against the built-in OpenSSL that comes with the OS. An exception is allowed in that case, and people have been tending to want to utilize that option. > also from a pratical point of view when uploading info files should I be > iterating the revision number even though the package has not necessarily > made it out of the tracker yet. It would seem a lot more convenient from a > maintainer point of view but if someone could confirm that would be great. > You can--it really doesn't matter what the initial revision of the package is. > Best Regards, > Rogue > > ---------- > R-Marechal > Toontrack Music, Head of Support > US: +1 (240) 764 4850 > UK: +44 (0)20 8816 7694 > FRANCE: +33 (0)870 444 062 -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink Documenter [Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment http://psfcwww2.psfc.mit.edu/ldx/ ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
