Rogue wrote:
[]
'interesting' discussion, I'm not big on license so it's great to see a
practical question brought so much in its trail.
I think I will just Restrict the license and forget about the nitty gritty
details for now, I have enough work on the claws branch to leave the religious
side alone ;-)
... ultimately I don't think it matters since the sylphhed I would consider
safe to include as binary in Fink distribution (if it is considered at some
point obviously) would be the sll disabled version. That's purely because of
what I use as source code for the respective versions.
In the sylpheed COPYING file I see the following:
Specific permission is granted for the GPLed code in this distribition to
be linked to OpenSSL without invoking GPL clause 2(b).
So it seems they are aware of the problem and have solved it, according
to google already several years ago. This package should not be restrictive.
--
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
