On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:42:03 -0800 Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 01 November 2005 at 14:38, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > > > > also from a pratical point of view when uploading info files > > > should I be iterating the revision number even though the package > > > has not necessarily made it out of the tracker yet. > > it doesn't matter, but it is a little messy isn't it? Why not just > fink rebuild the package in question? it's not an issue for me but it's a lot clearer when the file finally appears in Fink IMHO. say I upload a .info on Monday and revise it on Tuesday. In the meantime it may have been validated based on the original and the first revision posted... the only way for me to be sure which revision was considered is to scrutinize the details in Fink. of course I know I should preferably submit files that are final but in practice it's not necessarily possible, especially right now as I'm still unfamiliar with all the details and finding new ways to eliminate redundancy etc. OTOH if the person the package analysis is assigned to automatically gets notified of changes in the tracker it becomes somewhat a moot point. Best Regards, Rogue ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
