Revision -1001 is out now. I'm not sure if that fixes gcj (since it will take me until Sunday actually to build it on my machine).
Matthias Ringwald wrote: > Hi > > just to let you know, so far gcj in gcc43-1000 does not work. > jack howarth did suggest a fix ( calling contrib/download_ecj in the > source tree before compiling) but something failed. > I will re-try in the next days. > > matthias > > > On 20.03.2008, at 00:35, Ben Abbott wrote: > >> On Mar 14, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: >> >>> Jean-François Mertens wrote: >>> [] >>>> but right, if true it would encourage a fast update of anything in >>>> fink to gcc43 >>> >>> I too have come round to the conclusion that this is indeed the best >>> plan for action at this moment. I would suggest that we band >>> together and do this update rather quickly. >>> >>> I am CCing fink-devel so that the maintainers of the 28 packages >>> concerned get a chance to act, but I think we should just test this >>> upgrade for each of these packages and then simply go ahead and >>> change any package that builds correctly with gcc43. As far as I >>> know, no problem with the switch from gcc42 to gcc43 has yet been >>> reported. >>> >>> Here are the package descriptions concerned: >>> >>> graphics/pdftk.info > ... > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
