Jack Howarth wrote: > Robert, > Try changing... > > Revision: 1 > > ...to... > > Revision: 100 > > I thought that the variants had to either be of the > same version but a greater revision or have an epoch > if the version in the variant was smaller than the > main package file. So the current unzip-10.4.info > should have been epoched, while the packaging I proposed > just needs a Revision: 100 (unless someone jumps in > and epochs the current unzip-10.4 before we update it). > Jack > > > It wasn't epoched because it didn't build. If we were forcing a downgrade of an installed version, an Epoch is appropriate, but we're not.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
