On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 09:28:59AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > Robert, > Try changing... > > Revision: 1 > > ...to... > > Revision: 100 > > I thought that the variants had to either be of the > same version but a greater revision or have an epoch > if the version in the variant was smaller than the > main package file. So the current unzip-10.4.info > should have been epoched, while the packaging I proposed > just needs a Revision: 100 (unless someone jumps in > and epochs the current unzip-10.4 before we update it).
No, just need to make sure the unzip.info revision is raised even higher than unzip-10.4.info (which only needs to be 1 higher than corrent unzip.info) after unzip-10.4.info is upgraded. _If_and_when_core_decides_ to change unzip-10.4.info or unzip.info, we will make sure each distribution's pkg is appropriate and that upgrades work correctly. dan -- Daniel Macks [email protected] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list [email protected] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
