On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:32:52PM +0200, Sébastien Maret wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could gcc46 be moved to 10.5/stable and 10.6/stable ? One of my package
> depends on that version of the compiler, so I can't move it to stable.
>
> A more general question: now that we've only have a stable branch in 10.7,
> wouldn't it make sense to drop the unstable branches in 10.5 and 10.6 (or
> rather rename the unstable branches to stable) ? Maintaining stable and
> unstable versions on 5 different OS/arch (10.7/x86_64, 10.6/x86_64, 10.5/i386
> and 10.5/powerpc) is too much work for developers IMHO.
Sébastien,
I suggested that we merge the current unstable 10.5/10.6 into stable
10.5/10.6 a month
or so back. While there was general agreement that it made sense, nothing has
been done yet.
It is pretty pointless for fink to maintaining the stable/unstable split with
no prospects
of being able to do binary releases any time soon.
Jack
>
> Cheers,
> Sébastien
>
>
> ,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
Fink-devel mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
