-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/16/11 2:35 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: > On 15/09/11 16:13, David R. Morrison wrote: [] >> But there are also lots of unmaintained things in unstable, many >> of them very old, so I think it would be dangerous to just dump >> everything to stable. I like Alexander's approach. > > Why would this be more dangerous than the current situation, where > almost everybody is using the unstable tree anyway? Do you know > anyone, except some innocent newbies, who is really using the > stable tree? >
That's more of a question of "Do we bother to keep this old, broken stuff or update it?" In principle it's probably just as easy to decide on that after a rollover. - -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk58ni4ACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ+fLQCgncL3YvygW2cHgUNrvika7q7D PKEAn14kwnwfEGCOzvq1FYJZlRAp3tnz =o1e/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
