le 9/02/05 14:22, Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a �crit�: > > On Feb 9, 2005, at 7:45 AM, Asko Kauppi wrote: > >> >> Fink is the last resort where SQLite3 has not surfaced, yet. Is there >> a real reason for this (technical, otherwise?) or.. is it just not so >> important? >> >> SQLite3 is a more efficient, new version of SQLite. It is designed to >> co-exist peacefully with old SQLite, so I see no real reason why Fink >> shouldn't have it. >> >> Anyone else interested / using it? >> >> -ak > > Umm...maybe because Fink is a volunteer project and nobody's had time > to do it? > May be because ./configure --prefix=/sw does the job!
Antoine -- --------------------------- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------- Antoine P�rus Service informatique Cnrs/In2p3/Lal (Acc�l�rateur Lin�aire) BP34 91898 Orsay Cedex France Tel. 33-1-64 46 84 43 Fax 33-1-69 07 94 04 ---------------------------------ooO-=-Ooo---------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
