Kevin Horton wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:03:29 +0100
> Jean-François Mertens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[]
>>>Are you referring to qt4-x11.patch? If so, despite doing a self-
>>>update, I've still got the one from Nov 2007. And browsing the cvs
>>>tree via the web interface doesn't show a newer one.
>>>
>>
>>This is not normal. cvs log shows that patch being applied on jan 9.
>
>
> Is there any way this could be a problem on my end, or must this be a problem
> with cvs?
>
> How can I find a copy of this patch, so I can stick it in my local tree while
> we wait for things to be fixed?
There is perhaps some misunderstanding here. Jfm is talking about a CVS
patch applied to the file qt4-x11.info on Jan 9, and Kevin is talking
about the file qt4-x11.patch which, indeed, has not changed since last
November.
You can see whether your qt4-x11.info has the Jan 9 patch applied by
looking at the last line in the PatchScript. If it is
perl -pi -e 's,char [*]inp,const $&,'
config.tests/unix/gnu-libiconv/gnu-libiconv.cpp
then you have the latest version.
--
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
