On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:43:23 +0100 Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Horton wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:03:29 +0100 > > Jean-François Mertens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [] > >>>Are you referring to qt4-x11.patch? If so, despite doing a self- > >>>update, I've still got the one from Nov 2007. And browsing the cvs > >>>tree via the web interface doesn't show a newer one. > >>> > >> > >>This is not normal. cvs log shows that patch being applied on jan 9. > > > > > > Is there any way this could be a problem on my end, or must this be a > > problem with cvs? > > > > How can I find a copy of this patch, so I can stick it in my local tree > > while we wait for things to be fixed? > > There is perhaps some misunderstanding here. Jfm is talking about a CVS > patch applied to the file qt4-x11.info on Jan 9, and Kevin is talking > about the file qt4-x11.patch which, indeed, has not changed since last > November. > > You can see whether your qt4-x11.info has the Jan 9 patch applied by > looking at the last line in the PatchScript. If it is > > perl -pi -e 's,char [*]inp,const $&,' > config.tests/unix/gnu-libiconv/gnu-libiconv.cpp > > then you have the latest version. Yes, there was definitely a misunderstanding. I checked my .info file - it is dated Jan 9, and it is in fact the latest version, based on the last line in the PatchScript. Thanks for your help Martin. -- Kevin Horton ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
