>On 21 May 2008, at 10:08, Martin Costabel wrote: > >> ... >> ((int)sem != (int)SEM_FAILED) >> or >> (sem != (sem_t *)SEM_FAILED) >> >> Google shows >> <http://paulbeachsblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/building-firebird-20x- >> macos-semaphoreh.html> >> where they propose the latter in a similar situation. > >Seems indeed the more sound solution. >Committed that way. > Remember, under 10.5, SEM_FAILED is already sem_t *. Will this affect the cast?
James McKenzie ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
