>On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 09:02:18AM -0700, James Mckenzie wrote: >> >On 21 May 2008, at 04:53, Daniel Macks wrote: >> > >> >> Could this pile of sed patchscript be converted into an actual .patch >> >> file? >[...] >> >Hence my preference for patchscripts in general ... :) >> >> All of this discussion of patch files vice patchscripts is not getting the >> problem I reported fixed. > >It is the primary reason why I have never bothered trying to work on >this package. Again, you don't seem to grasp the importance of "make >it easy for others to help" in a collaborative environment. > I will reclaim my 10.4 PPC system and see what differences there are between a Tiger and Leopard build at the ln -s and cp -P points. However, I am of the opinion that the extra /lib directory is the source of the mislinking problem and when the cp command executes, the packager fails and that is what creates the error condition. Maybe reading through the Makefile a few times will help.
James McKenzie ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
