On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:53:50AM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > > Fink should definitely handle the *.la file mess. But with the currently > greatly reduced activity of the Fink chiefs, it is not sure when this > will happen. They had a year to mull it over.
There's a solution I proposed on wiki a few weeks ago with a test implementation. I wrote it about 3 years ago (it's a generic hack that could certainly handle the .la cleanups) and keep asking for testers (I'm not going to release a hack to a root-running 'dpkg' without second sets of eyes!). I've gotten IRC "seems like a decent idea", but nothing more. Maybe when wiki revives I'll actually get some testing feedback. dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
