Am 28.12.2012 um 17:10 schrieb Peter Dyballa:
> Conflicts: imagemagick, imagemagick-nox,
> graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat
> Replaces: imagemagick, imagemagick-nox, imagemagick10-shlibs,
> imagemagick-nox10-shlibs, imagemagick10-dev (<= 1:6.3.5-1006),
> graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat
> Provides: (%type_raw[-nox] = .) imagemagick-nox
Iwas a bit too fast on my keyboard…
The latter "Provides:" statement seems a bit incorrect: shouldn't it be
imagemagick2-dev?
The statements "(%type_raw[-nox] = .)" evaluate presumingly to TRUE in the case
of building the X client software, while in the "nox" case I should better use
(%type_raw[-nox] = nox)?
Instead the same is "." is used in the imagemagick-nox.info file, which then
evaluates to FALSE. This way Fink seems to enter a conflict…
--
Greetings
Pete
No man was ever taken to hell by a woman unless he already had a ticket in his
pocket, or at least had been fooling around with timetables.
– Archie Goodwin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and
much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow -
350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts.
SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812
_______________________________________________
Fink-users mailing list
[email protected]
List archive:
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.user
Subscription management:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
