Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 10:58:20 UTC+2, Henri Colaux a écrit :
> As a follow-up question: I could simulate my system using a triangular > mesh this way. Is there a problem doing so ? > > > Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 10:02:20 UTC+2, Henri Colaux a écrit : > >> As advised by Jonathan Guyer, I added an issue to GitHub: >> https://github.com/usnistgov/fipy/issues/819 >> >> Le jeudi 16 septembre 2021 à 09:49:47 UTC+2, Henri Colaux a écrit : >> >>> >>> Dear Fipy users, >>> >>> I would like to draw your attention on the question I asked on >>> stackoverflow : >>> >>> >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69196642/define-a-non-cartesian-mesh-in-fipy >>> >>> I am trying to simulate the elementary unit of a 2D system that have a >>> P6mm symmetry in fipy and I would like to define a non-cartesian mesh that >>> describes the system described below. Yet, >>> mesh = fipy.Grid2D(nx = 10, ny = 10, dx = 1., dy = 1.) >>> >>> only returns uniform meshes. I thought of changing the FaceVariable, but >>> it seems it only accepts Boolean variables. I could also simulate a >>> cartesian system equivalent to this one, but there would be redondant data. >>> Would someone have a better approach? >>> >>> You can see the picture on the stackoverflow question. >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Henri Colaux >>> >> -- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fipy+unsubscr...@list.nist.gov View this message at https://list.nist.gov/fipy --- To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fipy+unsubscr...@list.nist.gov.
