On Mar 19, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Daniel Wheeler wrote:
Jon, Is Charles getting the right results (fipy has the right face
ordering), but Mayavi is just spitting out
strange output (mayavi has the wrong face ordering)?
I don't know.
Either way, I think we might want to get together
and fix fipy to work with gmsh 2.
Definitely.
I assume the ordering is correct as far as the solver goes :-)
I'm not sure I'd jump to that conclusion. ;^)
How can the patterns in https://www.matforge.org/fipy/attachment/
wiki/SurfaceOfSphere/sphere_face.png be so reasonable?
Surely the results would be nonsense? The blue and red patches
(other than the black faces) seem to be about right.
Charless can confirm, but I don't think that's the result of a
simulation. That's just the same x*y*z initial condition that I used
in the demo. The cell centers are located where they're located, so
that would come out right, but if the face-vertex ordering or face
orientation is botched (it appears to be), then I can't see how the
solutions would be right.
