If he did that. He denies it, and based on investigations of other cases which revealed a pattern of suborned perjury and fabricated evidence by prosecutors, we should not accept the validity of the charge. This is a political case and prosecutors will do what it takes to get a conviction. It is very easy to fabricate both audio and video tapes, even in real time, to make it appear that anyone is saying anything. See Testilying: Police Perjury and What to Do About It, Christopher Slobogin, Fall 1996 (67 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1037) at http://www.constitution.org/lrev/slobogin_testilying.htm
Also http://www.batasayti.freeservers.com/photo5.html
Do your own changing of one voice into another on an audio recording: http://internet.newfreeware.com/programs/580/
David T. Hardy wrote:
The defendant in that case was a bit of a difficult person, with result that he has far bigger worries than the machinegun charge..... I guess no one told him that judges tend to show annoyance toward a litigant who tries to hire a hit man to knock off a judge....
---------------------------------------------------------------- Our efforts depend on donations from people like you. Directions for donors are at http://www.constitution.org/whatucando.htm Constitution Society 7793 Burnet Road #37, Austin, TX 78757 512/374-9585 www.constitution.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
