this statute appears to be from 2001; has there been no update? I bet the screeners have the power to disarm you and so the only way to take a gun past the sceeners is to conceal it, thus violation the law.

Paul Finkelman

David T. Hardy wrote:

At 11:04 AM -0600 12/24/03, Paul Finkelman wrote:

Try getting on a plane with one that is not concealed and see what happens.


Yes, there may be a nontrivial risk that the security screeners become critical of your conduct. Still, an interesting point of statute. I'd wager that there are some FAA regulations somewhere in the Code of Federal Regs that bar it, tho.

Reminds me of one Ariz. statute I found.

It defines explosives, with a proviso that the word does not apply to loaded ammunition or smokeless powder.

Then it defines firearm as a device which expels a projectile by means of an explosive.


--
Paul Finkelman
Chapman Distinguished Professor of Law
University of Tulsa College of Law
3120 East 4th Place
Tulsa, OK   74104-3189

918-631-3706 (office)
918-631-2194 (fax)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Reply via email to