On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 02:07:24PM -0500, Greg Jacobs wrote: > > Howdy; I am one of the lurkers in these parts but I have recently been > presented with an interesting question that is somewhat outside my > experience and I bet I can get some direction here. I understand, in > a general sense, the loss of rights that convicted felons are > subject ...
Here's a long shot: People v. Blue, Colo., 544 P.2d 385 (1975). "Defendants have not contended that they were armed because of any threat to their lives or in order to defend their homes or property." (544 P.2d 391) I read this to suggest that the Colorado Supremes might possibly agree that self defense was a legitimate reason for a felon to possess firearms, but since the defendants hadn't raised the issue, they weren't going to talk about it. -- Charles Curley /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign Looking for fine software \ / Respect for open standards and/or writing? X No HTML/RTF in email http://www.charlescurley.com / \ No M$ Word docs in email Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0 809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
