Greg Jacobs wrote:

[In Texas,] to forbid a non-employee from carrying a concealed handgun onto one's private property one MUST post the statutory sign.

As I noted earlier (but was not specific), there are still a handful of private properties where carrying a handgun is prohibited, but no sign is required:

* Educational institutions (i.e. private schools)
* Polling places (while election or early voting is in progress), which are frequently private premises.
* A racetrack
* Where a high school, collegiate, or professional sporting event or interscholastic event is taking place, unless the license holder is a participant in the event and a handgun is used in the event * on the premises of a business that that derives 51 percent or more of its income from the sale or service of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption.

A separate provision of law requires that the last one post a sign that identifies it as meeting that criteria. However, there is no penalty for not posting the sign as required, an no explicit defense to prosecution if an this particular offense is inadvertantly committed because a sign was not posted. From what I've heard, the lack of posting doesn't appear to have been a problem, although some places that clearly do NOT meet the 51% threshold have been posting the sign.

Then
there is my favorite sign that says that the carrying of an UNLICENSED handgun is prohibited. I'm not sure what the point is but it amuses me.

That particular sign is required by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, per the TABC code:

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/AL/content/htm/al.003.00.000011.00.htm#11.041.00

When the CHL law was first enacted in Texas in 1995, no changes were made to the TABC code -- which still had its own prohibitions against possession of weapons on premises that it licensed and requirements for posting a sign that didn't discriminate between CHL holders and everyone else.

There was a bit of confusion for a while, as the TABC took the position that their prohibition was still binding. After a while, they saw the writing on the wall and backed off -- until the law was again changed in 1997 along with a significant number of other corrections:

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/cgi-bin/tlo/textframe.cmd?LEG=75&SESS=R&CHAMBER=H&BILLTYPE=B&BILLSUFFIX=02909&VERSION=5&TYPE=B

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to