At 09:15 PM 8/7/2005, Joseph E. Olson wrote:
This is precisely what the Minnesota churches DO NOT want to do. 

>>> Greg Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 08/07/05 8:56 PM >>
[In Texas,] to forbid a non-employee from carrying  a concealed handgun onto one's private property one MUST post the statutory sign.

Neither do most churches, stores, restaurants, hospitals, and similar places in Texas.  I know of only one store and one nursing home at this time that still posts the correct sign to notify people that the carrying of guns therein is forbidden, etc.  Everyone else who used to do it seems to have dropped the practice or the sign they use is incorrect and doesn't create enforceability under the statute.  Then there is my favorite sign that says that the carrying of an UNLICENSED handgun is prohibited.  I'm not sure what the point is but it amuses me.

***GRJ***
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to