On 8/6/05 8:55 PM, "Robert Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/6/05 7:50 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Raises an interesting question, which I've occasionally encountered before:
>>
>> If they win, what is the remedy?
>
> They're asking for an injunction that would allow them to continue enforcing
> general trespass principles against those who bring weapons onto their
> property, in spite of the statutory restriction.
I should clarify that this is what they were asking for in the previous
suit. For apparently strategic reasons, this count is not included in the
complaint in the current action, though I suspect it will later be brought
either by amendment or by friendly intervenors.
--
Bob Woolley
St. Paul, MN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The Boy Scouts don't allow non-Christians or gays in their organization.
You would think that would weed out the nutters but apparently not."
-- Kinky Friedman
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.
