http://www.nj.com/opinion/ledger/perspective/index.ssf?/base/news-1/11960553 48253430.xml <http://www.nj.com/opinion/ledger/perspective/index.ssf?/base/news-1/1196055 348253430.xml&coll=1> &coll=1
"Under this approach, it would not matter which view of the Second Amendment is adopted by the Supreme Court. Under either [individual/collective], the District of Columbia law would be upheld because the government has a legitimate interest in discouraging gun violence, and prohibiting ownership of guns is a reasonable way to attain the goal . the Supreme Court should simply say whatever the meaning of the Second Amendment, gun control laws are allowed so long as they are reasonable." Guy Smith Author, Gun Facts [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.GunFacts.info
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
