What 1937 property law/decision is Chermerinsky referring to? Somehow, I doubt that it was used to overturn a right of the people enumerated in the Bill of Rights.
But what do I know? I'm not going to be Dean of my own law school. I do know that I'd not recommend his new law school -- and that Duke's Law School ranking ought to improve with it's upcoming vacancy. --jcr > http://www.nj.com/opinion/ledger/perspective/index.ssf?/base/news-1/1196055348253430.xml&coll=1 > > <http://www.nj.com/opinion/ledger/perspective/index.ssf?/base/news-1/1196055348253430.xml&coll=1> > > > “Under this approach, it would not matter which view of the Second > Amendment is adopted by the Supreme Court. Under either > [individual/collective], the District of Columbia law would be upheld > because the government has a legitimate interest in discouraging gun > violence, and prohibiting ownership of guns is a reasonable way to > attain the goal … the Supreme Court should simply say whatever the > meaning of the Second Amendment, gun control laws are allowed so long as > they are reasonable.” _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
