At 02:00 PM 4/27/2008, From Prof Olson's notes about Marion Hammer's comments:

"The right to control one's property is not absolute."

I can't thank the Professor enough for that piece, which I had not read previously. In summary it says more about what i was suggesting in my last message than I think I was prepared to say myself at the moment I wrote it. The right to control one's property is not absolute. Excellent. Neither is the right to speak freely about anything, anyone, any time, in any way absolute. Neither is the right to keep and bear arms absolute. Therein lies the framework for the future discourse, to use the Professor's word!

Excellent!

***GRJ***  
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to