Guy writes: > ... > Disallowing employees to keep firearms in their cars is not an act of > disarming - it is a condition of employment, and a contractual agreement.
Some contracts aren't enforceable, due to being against public policy. > In the contractual state of employment, the employee has the option of not > accepting the job, or quitting. Perhaps giving up a right to personal defense should come under this limitation on contracts? For many years, pretty much since the start of WW II, jobs have been reasonably easy to get, and the chance of starving for lack of work hasn't been a major issue. Under this history, "the option of not accepting the job, or quitting." is a real option. In bad economic times, such as most of the 1930s - which we hope will not come again, I'm not sure that it is a real option for most working people. --henry schaffer _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
