Gentlemen, Recognizing that some states have statutorily specified gun free zones (schools, courts, drinking establishments, etc.), and some permit individual sites to post themselves as "gun free," for those states that do not statute wise permit locations to declare themselves gun free, what is the legal standing of such a location that posts such a sign? I have heard the argument of private property rights, but personally consider this specious, as these are rarely mom and pops, but more often corporate identities, themselves not "private" identities. First, other than to attempt to have a "violator" warned against trespass and removed from the location, do they have any legal standing to prevent a legal firearms bearer from entry? Second, do they encumber any specifi liabilty themselves by this action, not being supported by law?
Paul Paul R. Laska cell 561-722-4435 landline 772-781-9014 In the name of freedom, there has to be a correlation between rights and duties, by which every person is called to assume responsibility for his or her choices. -- Pope Benedict XVI, addressing the UN General Assembly
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
