A property proprietor certainly has the right to prohibit entry of 
anything onto his property, along with the people carrying it, but the 
law may also recognize that if the excluded item has a function to 
protect the rights of the visitor, such as medicines or firearms might 
have, then he assumes legal liability for protecting those rights at 
least as effectively as the visitor would have had he retained 
possession of the excluded item. That means for something like an open 
parking lot, the proprietor would need to provide armed guards for the 
parking lot and visitors to it. If such protection is only available 
inside the building, then it could be reasonably maintained that the 
exercise of his right to exclude items from that parking lot would 
expose visitors to a risk that would make him civilly, and perhaps 
criminally, negligent.

To make the issue more clear, let us consider medicines rather than 
firearms. Suppose the proprietor forbids all medicines from his 
premises, including the parking lot, but has visitors, whether 
employees, vendors, or whatever, some of whom have, say, cardiovascular 
conditions that require them to have or take medicine during the day. 
Now let's say that a visitor, complying with the prohibition, has a 
debilitating or fatal heart attack or stroke while visiting that could 
likely have been prevented had he been able to carry his medicine. Is 
the proprietor liable in that situation, or did the visitor relieve him 
of liability by voluntarily complying with his prohibition? Or was the 
proprietor obligated to provide the medicines to his visitors while 
present? Now suppose the proprietor is not a private party for which 
visiting is entirely voluntary, but a government entity that can require 
persons to visit, such as a court. f not visiting is not an option, then 
it would seem that the proprietor has a duty to protect if he excludes 
visitors from carrying the means to protect themselves. Whether that be 
firearms or medicines it it is difficult to imagine that the proprietor 
could do that better in most cases than the visitor could do for himself.

-- Jon

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Constitution Society 2900 W Anderson Ln C-200-322, Austin, TX 78757
512/299-5001    www.constitution.org    [email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to