Ray writes,
>  ... Yes there are civilian analogs of M-16's but, except in rare
>  cases, civilians can buy only semi-automatics.  

  Basically correct IMHO - I won't quibble.

> Are semi-automatic "assault rifles," protected by the 2nd amendment? 

  Here I will quibble - "assault rifles" are "select fire" according to
the usual military technical definition.  That is, they can be switched
between semi- and full- auto modes - which makes them a "machinegun"
under the NFA.  The "Assault Weapon Ban" was of "assault weapons" and
did not include any select-fire weapons.

  It is a common error - often unintentional - to call these "assault
rifles."

> I think there are enough in circulation to make an argument that
> they are in common  use.  

  I've seen numbers suggesting that there are perhaps a million or more 
AR-15 type rifles in private ownership in the US.  (According to
http://www.thefiringline.com/forums/archive/index.php?t-117927.html
there were a total of over 200,000 produced in 1999-2000.)  The less
expensive (semi-auto) AK-47 very well may be more common.

> Do they play a large role in violent crime? No.
> Is there any good evidence that the temporary ban on them reduced gun
> violence?   No. Most serious gang bangers have moved up to fully automatics
> like AK-47's.  ...

  The name "AK-47" is ambiguous - it is manufactured in both semi-auto
and select-fire versions and they both are usually referred to by the
same name.  (I.e., it is as if the M16 and the AR-15 had the same name.)
I think that the semi-auto AK-47 versions usually given somewhat
different names (e.g. MAK-90, M-76, SAR-1 and many others - see, e.g.,
http://www.firearmsfirst.com/?p=16 for some discussion - this page uses
AK-47 generically and refers to the select-fire version as the "True
AK-47".)

> My personal opinion, however, is that they are not a good choice for
> home defense.  

  Again I'll quibble, because I think this blanket statement doesn't
take into account the many different living arrangements in our country.
A firearm unsuitable for defense of an apartment in a city may be very
suitable for defense of a home in a rural area where the next residence
may be a mile away.

--henry schaffer
> ...
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to