There is a US Supreme Court case from the 1950's that says that the Bill
of Rights trumps ALL of the original Constitution, including the treaty
clause.  I think it is Reid v. Covert.  It's about a military wife
killing her GI husband in Germany.  Under the Status of Forces treaty,
she was tried by Courts-Martial not in a civilian US District Court.  S.
Ct. reversed.
 
*****************************************************************************************
Professor Joseph Olson, J.D., LL.M.                                  
o-   651-523-2142  
Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037)                    f-   
651-523-2236
St. Paul, MN  55113-1235                                               
 c-   612-865-7956
[email protected]                    
http://law.hamline.edu/constitutional_law/joseph_olson.html             
      


>>> "Guy Smith" <[email protected]> 7/8/2011 11:46 AM >>>

Since treaty law is not even close to being my expertise, I’ll lean on
the knowledge of this forum.
 
What are the anticipated mechanics and probable rulings if either CIFTA
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIFTA ) or the U.N. Arms Treaty (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_Trade_Treaty ) were ratified? Some
folks (including members of Obama’s camp) claim that treaty law has a
disabling affect on legislation, and some are as bold as to suggest it
can legally create regulatory control of enumerated rights (I fail to
find any worthy support for that last one).
 
My reading of CIFTA leads me to believe that it would vest the
Executive with a broad range of gun control obligations. In the absence
of judicial rulings otherwise, executive decisions on how to implement
the treaty would stand. If ratified (unlikely, but possible) it seems
this would create a never-ending series of legal challenges … enough to
keep Alan Gura gainfully employed well into his dotage.
 
Guy Smith
Shooting The Bull (
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0983240701/ref=as_li_tf_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=frethimed-20&linkCode=as2&camp=217145&creative=399373&creativeASIN=0983240701
) and Gun Facts ( http://www.gunfacts.info/ ) 
 
 
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to