Probably federal legislation since action by the House is essential to enactment of a federal statute and that body is not involved in "ratifying" a treaty. Just an off the cuff opinion.
>>> "Guy Smith" <[email protected]> 7/11/2011 4:30 PM >>> A follow-up question to the tribe. How are conflicts between federal legislation and treaty requirements resolved? Since both are codified as "supreme" via the supremacy clause, which trumps the other?
_______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
