> Just because it might not get traction immediately doesn't mean it > shouldn't be introduced
Like the Corwin Amendment ;-> Seriously though, there is an interesting question afoot. The Heller language was so lose as to nearly condone the acts this bill attempts to repeal. I suspect litigation will eventually be filed to overturn '34 and '68 under Heller, and I'd bet the attempt would fail. Though odds are currently against the bill gaining traction, the laws would need repealing if my prediction above holds true. It is generally good offense to push the agenda. Though public opinion is far less anti-gun than in previous decades, returning to mail-order firearms, no transfer taxes, etc. might not be within current public tolerance. Pushing an advantage too fast causes backlash (just ask Hitler). Guy Smith Author, Shooting The Bull (a field guide to identifying political lies in real-time) http://www.amazon.com/Shooting-Bull-Guy-Smith/dp/0983240701 _______________________________________________ To post, send message to [email protected] To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
