There is well done one study regarding domestic violence in New Orleans
that found that all differences could be explained by non-racial factors.
 Although it's a public health study since it doesn't deal with guns the
figures are probably not "cooked."  It's Spring Break so I won't be able to
post it until next week.

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Phil Lee <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> 4. If you have a scientific justification for your claim that "the
> racial/ethnic categories serve as a proxy for socio-economic factors and
> nothing more", I would like to see a cite for it.  It would be a useful
> shield against a bigotry claim.  While this claim is an article of faith
> among some, I've never seen a study on the subject.
>
> Phil
>
>
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* GunCite <[email protected]>
> *To:* Phil Lee <[email protected]>; "Olson, Joseph E." <
> [email protected]>
> *Cc:* "Firearms Reg, List" <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 25, 2013 5:17 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: High, very high, rates of homicide and suicide in Black
> communities.
>
> Speaking of state-level homicide, firearm prevalence, and states as
> laboratories...
>
> Homicide numbers can be sliced and diced to one's heart's discontent by
> year, state, race, age, etc., here:
> http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/mortrate10_sy.html and here:
> http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/dataRestriction_inj.html .
>
> Using the CDC data from above, Miller, et. al (
> http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953606004898 ) (2007)
> published an article stating, "Multivariate analyses found that states with
> higher rates of household firearm ownership had significantly higher
> homicide victimization rates of men, women and children."
>
> The above paper didn't divide the groups further by race or ethnicity.
>
> I recently ran some multiple regressions doing that. I'm still studying
> the issue and the following is only *preliminary*.
>
> After running a regression on white non-Hispanics (using the independent
> variables listed in the paper as well as a few others), there was still a
> positive correlation between homicides and states with higher firearms
> availability. Of course the regression coefficient for firearms
> availability was far smaller than it was for the black non-Hispanic group,
> but it was still positive (however slight).
>
> One doesn't have to run a regression analysis to see it  (at a simple
> bivariate level). If you run the data at either of the two links provided
> above, you'll see that states such as Alaska and Arkansas, with high
> firearms ownership rates, have higher levels of white homicide than average.
>
> Currently the available data, such as it is at the state level, favors the
> pro-control side allowing the Joyce Foundation to sponsor and crank-out
> these studies at will.
>
> What's missing from the equation, at the state level, are the prior
> records of both homicide offenders and victims. As this page shows:
> http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcgvmurd.html ,
> most of our homicide problem is probably a result of criminals (or those
> with prior criminal behavior) misusing guns.
>
> I don't think it's controversial to say more guns in the hands of
> criminals leads to more homicides.
>
> Of course this suggests until we have more complete information at the
> state level, such analyses are suspect to begin with.
>
> Parenthetically, the following shouldn't be necessary, but in case there
> are some idiots out there who believe analyzing crime stats by race is
> bigotry, in and of itself, the racial/ethnic categories serve as a proxy
> for socio-economic factors and nothing more.
> *From:* Phil Lee <[email protected]>
> *To:* "Olson, Joseph E." <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* "Firearms Reg, List" <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 25, 2013 12:30 PM
> *Subject:* Re: High, very high, rates of homicide and suicide in Black
> communities.
>
>
> If we dare to evade the "bigot embargo" and talk about firearm use by
> race, we can note that whites suicide at about 1.8 times the rate of
> minorities in Maryland (and likely elsewhere).
>
> The lack of race based reporting of violence measures over-simplifies the
> evaluation of different violence suppression policies and can produce the
> wrong conclusions.  If you view the states as a laboratory for the US as a
> whole, you might wrongly judge a policy good, state A shows lower violence
> with that policy, whereas that result is from a favorable demographic mix
> of races.  A better method of comparison would be to compare race by race
> (and age by age).
>
> The race based violence issues haven't been a secret for a long time, I
> talked about it in a posting 
> http://www.mcrkba.org/InternationalCrime.html("Comparing International Crime 
> Statistics") where I noted, "No one
> publishes crime data using demographically similar populations (accounting
> for differences in racial populations, age distributions and migrant
> populations – especially considering illegals) to make a comparison between
> the US and the UK or Canada."  And I was certainly NOT the first to notice
> race based violence issues and those related to age and citizenship.
>
> So, Maryland's suicide rate being lower than the US as a whole isn't like
> due to its gun control policies, but more likely due to its large
> proportion of minorities and Catholics who typically have low rates of
> suicide no matter where they live.
>
> Both sides use data selectively to make arguments and being aware of these
> differences can speed the finding of the data to support an argument, but I
> think the side opposing gun control has the better data -- if only
> pro-freedom groups would make the investment in good statistical analyses.
>
> Phil
>
>
>    *From:* "Olson, Joseph E." <[email protected]>
> *To:* Phil Lee <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* "Firearms Reg, List" <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 25, 2013 1:13 PM
> *Subject:* Re: High, very high, rates of homicide and suicide in Black
> communities.
>
> The secret is out now.  Last Summer the WSJ had a front page article on
> Black-on-Black killings.
>
> It's cultural.  In the 1880's it was hopeless, chemically dependent young
> White men in the "wild West."  Now it's hopeless, chemically dependent
> young Black men in urban areas.  Both groups hid the *nothing* they had
> behind a great show of bravado.  You "diss" me and I'll kill you.
>  According to retired UCLA historian Roger D. McGrath the death rate was
> huge in this class but narrowly limited to the West's version of the "bad
> man."  Every one else was safe (*safer* in 1880 when every other man
> carried a gun than today when you have to 'Dial 9-1-1" and wait for the
> professionals).  In Minnesota, at least the pattern continues in 2013.
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Phil Lee <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> A point to contemplate is the effect of the minority murder rates to
> effect rates in the various states.  So, southern states have high murder
> rates which gun control groups blame on high gun ownership, but is more
> likely due to the high proportion of minorities, who have low gun ownership
> rates.  But we can't talk about this issue lest we be labeled bigots.
>
> Phil
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 24, 2013, at 7:00 PM, "Olson, Joseph E." <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Yes.  You are correct.
>
> But this is politics not academia.  Which is why the anti's use whatever
> numbers that support the narrative (learned in J School?).  I didn't write
> the original piece and Belgium is a bad choice since it's suicide rate is
> astonishing.
>
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Volokh, Eugene <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>                 The CDC,
> http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/su6001a14.htm, tbl. 2, reports
> (2007 data) that the white non-Hispanic homicide rate was 2.75 (averaging
> the male and the female rates); among black non-Hispanics, it was 24, among
> Hispanics 7.5, among American Indians 7.85, and among Asians 2.4.****
> ** **
>                * But in any event, I don’t think it’s quite right to
> compare the white homicide rate in the U.S. against the total homicide rate
> in Belgium (or any similar country).  Belgium presumably has its own
> minority groups, which might well have higher homicide rates for their own
> social reasons.  So it seems to me that we should compare the homicide rate
> among the majority racial group in the U.S. against the homicide rate among
> the majority racial (or, as relevant, ethnic) group in the foreign country,
> not among the whole population of the foreign country.*****
> ** **
>                 Eugene****
> ** **
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Olson, Joseph E.
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 24, 2013 12:37 PM
> *To:* Firearms Reg, List
> *Subject:* High, very high, rates of homicide and suicide in Black
> communities.****
> ** **
> I believe this is true.  Anyone have the cites to the data?****
> ** **
> "The homicide rate among whites in the US is roughly the same as the
> homicide rate in Belgium (1.5-1.7/100,000). Among Blacks, the rare is
> 21/100,000. That's more than double the hispanic rate of 8/100,000. Of
> those three groups, blacks are the least likely to own a gun. Homicide in
> the US is not a gun problem, it is a young black man problem."****
> ** **
> Largely (entirely?) caused by social/cultural deficiencies.
> ****
> ** **
> -- ****
>
> **************************************************************************************************************
> Professor Joseph Olson, J.D.(*Hon*. Duke), LL.M.(*Tax*. Florida)
>                  o    651-523-2142
> Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037)
>                       f     651-523-2236
> St. Paul, MN  55113-1235
>                                      c    612-865-7956****
> [email protected]
> http://law.hamline.edu/constitutional_law/joseph_olson.html****
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to [email protected]
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> **************************************************************************************************************
> Professor Joseph Olson, J.D.(*Hon*. Duke), LL.M.(*Tax*. Florida)
>                  o    651-523-2142
> Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037)
>                       f     651-523-2236
> St. Paul, MN  55113-1235
>                                      c    612-865-7956
> [email protected]
> http://law.hamline.edu/constitutional_law/joseph_olson.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to [email protected]
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> **************************************************************************************************************
> Professor Joseph Olson, J.D.(*Hon*. Duke), LL.M.(*Tax*. Florida)
>                  o    651-523-2142
> Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037)
>                       f     651-523-2236
> St. Paul, MN  55113-1235
>                                      c    612-865-7956
> [email protected]
> http://law.hamline.edu/constitutional_law/joseph_olson.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to [email protected]
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to [email protected]
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
>
>
>


-- 
**************************************************************************************************************
Professor Joseph Olson, J.D.(*Hon*. Duke), LL.M.(*Tax*. Florida)
               o    651-523-2142
Hamline University School of Law (MS-D2037)
                    f     651-523-2236
St. Paul, MN  55113-1235
                                     c    612-865-7956
[email protected]
http://law.hamline.edu/constitutional_law/joseph_olson.html
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to