This one?
http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2594804
Although they mention "gun violence" at lot, the basic premise is that
those who hang with bad guys are in danger because of that association
(nothing new). The focus is on people and how to divert those people from
using "violence" as a response to everything.
********************************************************************************************************************
Professor Joseph Olson, J.D.(*Honors,* Duke), Ll.M (Florida)
Office 651-695-7674|
Hamline University School of Law (Emeritus)
Fax: 651-290-6426
Mitchell-Hamline School of Law (Emeritus & Adjunct)
C*ell 612-865-7956*
[email protected] <[email protected]> [primary] *or*
[email protected] [secondary]
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Henry Schaffer <[email protected]> wrote:
> This on the air this evening on NPR's All Things Considered
> http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/01/03/
> 508037642/study-says-gun-violence-should-be-treated-as-
> a-public-health-crisis
>
> It has a link which is supposed to go to the study in JAMA (Journal of the
> American Medical Assoc) but mistakenly links to a 30 year old study.
>
> NPR says, "David Stark, one of the study's leaders ..." - so I searched
> JAMA for his name, and found this just published article:
> ------------------
> JAMAResearch LetterJanuary 3, 2017
> Funding and Publication of Research on Gun Violence and Other Leading
> Causes of DeathDavid E. Stark, MD, MS; Nigam H. Shah, MBBS, PhD
> JAMA. 2017; 317(1):84-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16215
>
> This study uses Centers for Disease Control and Prevention mortality and
> federal agency research funding data to compare funding for and publication
> of gun violence research with that for 30 other leading causes of death in
> the United States.
>
> Abstract:
> The United States has the highest rate of gun-related deaths among
> industrialized countries, with more than 30 000 fatalities annually.1 To
> date, research on gun violence has been limited. A 1996 congressional
> appropriations bill stipulated that “none of the funds made available for
> injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and
> Prevention [CDC] may be used to advocate or promote gun control.”2 Similar
> restrictions were subsequently extended to other agencies (including the
> National Institutes of Health), and although the legislation does not ban
> gun-related research outright, it has been described as casting a pall over
> the research community.2,3 This study sought to determine whether funding
> and publication of gun violence research are disproportionately low
> relative to the mortality rate from this cause.
> ---------------
>
> which doesn't quite fit the story of what I heard on the air, (which had a
> lot about violence in social networks in Chicago- and there is no link the
> the recording of the on-air item. Maybe there will be tomorrow?) but it
> does have that Figure 1 shown on the web.
>
> --henry schaffer
>
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to [email protected]
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as
> private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are
> posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or
> wrongly) forward the messages to others.
>
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/firearmsregprof
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.
