Tim somehow neglects to mention that Barras was able to get out of Martin's house and that his body was found in "in the undergrowth". (See: http://makeashorterlink.com/?I2DC15375, near the bottom.) He also manages to neglect to mention that the jury was illogical enough to convict Martin of the murder of Barras while acquitting him of the attempted murder of Fearon. (See: http://makeashorterlink.com/?I2CC12375) Doesn't Tim check his facts?
Lowell C. Savage It's the freedom, stupid! Gun control: tyrants' tool, fools' folly.
Tim Lambert wrote, in part:
This article somehow neglects to mention that Martin shot Barras in the back and left him to die. It also manages to neglect to mention that the jury did not believe Martin's claims to have acted in self-defence or "blind panic". This was printed in the Wall Street Journal? Don't they check their facts in that paper?
