----- Original Message ----- From: "J. N. Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 6:32 AM Subject: [inbox] Re: Restrain your amazement
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert J. Spitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 3:20 PM > Subject: Restrain your amazement > > > > In his comments on my 2000 Chicago-Kent Law Review article, Clayton Cramer > is wrong in every instance. See below. > > Regards, > > Bob Spitzer > > > > So Bob and I agree, for different reasons, that Clayton's criticisms miss > the mark. I wasn't criticizing the guts of the article--I was just pointing out that even the most cursory fact checking would have got something like that. I guess Chicago-Kent Law Review didn't bother with fact checkers for this august collection of scholars?
