On 04/11/11 14:33, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote: > 11.04.2011 12:28, Alex Peshkoff wrote: >> Taking into an account Dmirty's sample with XSQLDA I must say that may >> be not everything SO bad in this area. At least somehow it did work all >> this time. What is problematic - how to add something to such structures? > Make it internal. The main problem with XSQLDA is not actually expanding > it, but keeping > backward compatibility. At the time when isc_db_handle was pointer to struct, > there was no > problem to expand this structure because user operated with a pointer only, > but never with > structure's fields itself.
Dimitry, how is it related with internals of isc_db_handle? May be you mean some other structure? To deal with results (and parameters) users always had to work with XSQLDA members. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Xperia(TM) PLAY It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming smartphone on the nation's most reliable network. And it wants your games. http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
